Womenfolk should be birthing the fine, strapping blue-eyed babies and teaching them the gospel of Our Lord Jesus H. Christ and currency should be abolished, since the American dollar is chock full of detection devices and tracking chips. Further, the government is using pollution techniques to chemically alter your brain and allow them to have MIND CONTROL, so be sure to use special, libertarian-approved water filtration devices, and grow all of your own produce. Never flush your turds, because they’re sent straight to a specialized government lab to analyze the foods you eat and gauge the ebb and flow of consumer spending, thus affecting price increases. Instead, take your turds out on moonless nights and burn them and scatter the ashes on private, libertarian-owned land. Send all blacks to Africa. Give everyone guns and refuse to carry the identification cards that are mandated by the US Fascist Regime. Buy and keep gold, and use it for trade. Drinking colloidal silver may turn your face purple, but it’ll deflect the radio waves from government installed but Nike-owned satellite’s that beam messages into your head and tell you to buy shoes, listen to rap music, crave large juicy booties and eat Twinkies. 9/11 was faked. Moon landing was faked. JFK is alive. When you get your dog vaccinated, they’re actually bugging it with listening devices. Purchasing toilet paper assists the surge of the invading Chinaman.

That’s Ron Paul.

It is unfortunate in the sense that Paul’s libertarian-constitutional approach fits well with the legislative choices he has made to date, whether he is actively for or against gay marriage. I believe people are questioning his heart.

In light of all this, I do hope he wins. I see his ideologies very similar to my own. I would hate to say 9 out of 10 aren’t bad, but I see no other alternative besides not voting.

Whoever you vote for, vote with your conscience. I can understand those fighting for this equal right in marriage to hesitate and have question with a politician’s heart, or a politician’s politics, if it rules over their sense of reason and justice.

Question: Does Ron’s sense of reason and justice trump his heart on this issue? I cannot say with absolute certainty, but hope beyond hope it does for the POTUS. The decision is yours and I fully understand anyone who chooses not to vote for Paul based on the question of his heart with this issue.

I will vote for Paul; and hope many others will do the same. And yes, the Question is still on my mind. But I still hope, and I still believe his sense of liberty and freedom will win over all hearts, including his own.

This isn’t about names, this is about rights.

You can only push people out of your way when those people are accountable, which means they can be held up to public scrutiny. Try holding up to public scrutiny a councilman who has lunch with the Mayor every week and the editor of the only paper in town. Federal officials are a lot easier to hold to public scrutiny because there’s a much bigger audience.

Ron Paul believes in states having the power, so yes he does vote against gay marriage in HIS state. That is his job.

It is easier to make a change in a smaller local government. Look at it like this:
In a federal government, you might have 2,000 people in your way, against what you want, but in a smaller local government you may only have 20 people in your way. Trust me, it’s a lot easier to push over 20 people rather than 2,000!

@ O-Douche
Ron Paul’s beliefs repress women? Your beliefs repress unborn children, oh wait, they kill babies.

Go Ronny!

universal civil unions might be simpler in some ways but it would end up being marriage by another name, once the legalities fall into place

We are virtually seniors, we are old before our times. It was life in the fast lane, all-night parties, smoking, over-eating and just plain genetics.

However, we cannot qualify for social security or lots of other government benefits. We do not get the senior discount at coffee shops or the zoo.

We need to be fully senior not just virtually senior. It is currently unfair that we we cannot add 30 years to our drivers licences.

We stood with signs to protest the hate at a senior trailer park that would not let us in. Those that lived there called us names I will not repeat.

I stand for rights for virtual seniors.

Indeed, your state government could deny you the right to marry your partner because you have a different skin color than her; it could wield its power to seize your property and replace it with a Quick-E-Mart; and it could impose an official theocratic governing system upon all its jurisdictions. But at the end of the day, Ron Paul would respond to this theocratic authoritarianism by saying, “well, as long as the federal government isn’t doing it, there’s no problem!”

Go instead to a federal issue and you still see Paul’s consistently antigay position. When asked about the current policy regarding gays in the military — which chucks them out if they are discovered to be gay he called that a “decent�? policy.

He then tried to divert the question by a lecture on group rights versus individual rights even though that was not part of the issue. The question was about individuals being discharged for being gay. INDIVIDUALS. After that detour he then claimed the policy was about disruptive behaviour when it is NOT about that. A non-disruptive gay person can be discharged just for being gay. If he doesn’t know the facts he should admit it. If he did know the facts then why falsify them? Neither is good for someone who wants to be president.

The final confirmation that he was not saying he supported equal rights for gays was the last question. The candidates were told by the moderator that if there was a single one of them willing to allow gay people to serve in the military to please speak up. Ron Paul kept his lips tightly sealed. So much for equal individual rights. He doesn’t believe in group rights but he does appear to believe is stripping people of rights based on their group.